ckt
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by ckt on May 28, 2006 2:50:01 GMT -5
We'll see if anyone wants to do a poll on this now after the 4 page "discussion"....
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic on May 28, 2006 3:06:12 GMT -5
Ya know, I thought about the password option, but I don't know if that would really solve anything. I mean, we can't really prove that we are the age we say we are, you know? But with or without it, I vote yes.
|
|
ckt
Full Member
Posts: 233
|
Post by ckt on May 28, 2006 3:07:34 GMT -5
well, atleast with a password it is your own fault for taking the extra step to sign up to see smut
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic on May 28, 2006 3:11:23 GMT -5
LOL, that's true. I do like the idea of the password, I just wasn't too sure if it was really feasible. But it's certainly not a bad idea. It's kinda like a way of basically agreeing to the disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ruffian of Old on May 28, 2006 3:51:32 GMT -5
*voted*
I didn't vote for a password, I just said "yes."
|
|
|
|
Post by laura6 on May 28, 2006 8:17:43 GMT -5
I think its a good idea
|
|
|
|
Post by MT on May 28, 2006 10:50:48 GMT -5
Are we talking about the entire board or just labeling threads? I don't think we should break off a new board or change the entire board. I hate exclusion and censorship both. I do understand some people are unentertained and even offended by my brand of humor and frank talking. Actually, I don't "understand" I just realize it is so and am unoffended. What would be best is if certain threads could be bannered with some kind of warning -- "shocking content follows that may repulse you, educate you or turn you on and cause you to jump on the nearest door knob or remotely possible appendage."
Better yet, if we could self-label posts to that effect since, for instance, the "hazel eyes" thread isn't generally risque but sometimes, some of us slip and accidentally fall in the gutter, and then wallow in it, and others come join the party. It's terrible. We should be ashamed. I feel so dirty. Darn.
|
|
|
|
Post by californiagrown on May 28, 2006 12:45:41 GMT -5
i voted yes but im not 18. . . i didnt get offended by the raunch of the other threads i enjoyed it laughed at it and joined in on it. . . but for jay and according to amy there are some not so ready for the raunch and i respect that and think we should have a seperate section of it on this board/forum thign what ever ya want to call it just for the raunch.
|
|
|
|
Post by MT on May 28, 2006 14:07:22 GMT -5
Ugh, how come I can't vote. The thingy won't let me place my doomahicky where I want to,or maybe I already didthat and don't remember? In which case I want to change my vote from yes to self moderate, or flagelate, or isolate, or whatever that option was. If ya get nasty, post in pink or somethin like that
|
|
|
|
Post by Bella on May 28, 2006 17:55:52 GMT -5
I actually like the post in pink idea. And I like moving to a different thread if the conversation is going to turn to "down there" and stay down there for a while. I'm not for a separate board.
|
|
|
|
Post by californiagrown on May 28, 2006 18:00:26 GMT -5
i like that idea bella how do u post in pink?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bella on May 28, 2006 18:38:22 GMT -5
When you are done typing, highlight what you typed and select pink from the pull down menu in the add tags section just above the emoticons.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ruffian of Old on May 28, 2006 20:17:23 GMT -5
Can we do red instead? I have to highlight the pink to read it otherwise it hurts my eyes. I just need a color that's a skotch darker.
|
|
|
|
Post by californiagrown on May 28, 2006 20:54:17 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300] KK red it is  [/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by MT on May 28, 2006 21:38:40 GMT -5
Can we do red instead? I have to highlight the pink to read it otherwise it hurts my eyes. I just need a color that's a skotch darker. Oh, I have a black back ground so the pink shows up like good and plenty. The red leaves retina burns, but I'll call that my penance. |
|
