|
Post by warhorse on May 12, 2006 22:00:16 GMT -5
What are you talking about?
|
|
|
Post by apolosgal on May 13, 2006 11:20:43 GMT -5
It annoys me that one of my guy friends wanted to ask me out but i didn't like him like that so he doesn't talk to me anymore. I really don't ever want to talk to him again. Is that too harsh?
|
|
|
Post by Krysten on May 13, 2006 13:43:00 GMT -5
I just now noticed that a lot of people registered on here in March hahahaha. Sorry random.
|
|
|
Post by sara on May 13, 2006 20:55:15 GMT -5
It annoys me that one of my guy friends wanted to ask me out but i didn't like him like that so he doesn't talk to me anymore. I really don't ever want to talk to him again. Is that too harsh? That kind of depends on how tactfully you told him you didn't want to date him. Did you leave his manhood in tact or send him off feeling worthless?
|
|
|
Post by warhorse on May 13, 2006 23:04:40 GMT -5
Ok, can someone please explain to me about this RX plans our brilliant leaders have concocted?
|
|
|
Post by amyurban on May 14, 2006 0:23:15 GMT -5
Good question, Sara, that's what I'd probably be asking you too, Apolosgal.
And Warhorse, ? Which one are you talkin' 'bout? I have an HSA so I don't have those kinds of problems anymore, Thank God!
|
|
|
Post by apolosgal on May 14, 2006 10:40:50 GMT -5
Oh i was nice about it, he was a friend and i didn't want to hurt him.
|
|
|
Post by Krysten on May 14, 2006 15:42:48 GMT -5
Well. That's good that you didn't want to hurt him.
|
|
|
Post by sara on May 14, 2006 17:34:22 GMT -5
Oh i was nice about it, he was a friend and i didn't want to hurt him. That's good. As long as you tried to be kind, you have nothing to be sorry about. Sometimes in situations like that, no matter how hard you try, it is jus impossible to tell someone something like that without hurting them. He'll get over it eventually. And you can't date someone just because you don't want to hurt them. A pity date would be the worst possible thing you could do. It would have ended up hurting him even more in the end. Just try to be friendly and nice to him but don't force it on him. He'll have to come around in his on time.
|
|
|
Post by Bella on May 14, 2006 18:21:38 GMT -5
Yeah, good-roads, good-weather... He'll come around when he's ready.
|
|
|
Post by apolosgal on May 14, 2006 18:34:42 GMT -5
Thanks guys!!
|
|
|
Post by warhorse on May 14, 2006 19:02:40 GMT -5
Good question, Sara, that's what I'd probably be asking you too, Apolosgal. And Warhorse, ? Which one are you talkin' 'bout? I have an HSA so I don't have those kinds of problems anymore, Thank God! I'm talking about the one for the senior citizens. They have to be part of a prescription drug plan or be penalized. I dont think it's right to force people in to joining a plan or insurance or what ever. Especially my dad, who hates taking pills and refuses it. It's requested in his will and in his doctor charts. I just dont like this thing that you have to have this coverage. I can understand to force insurance on homes and vehicles, because you can always opt on not owning either, but your own life and livelyhood?
|
|
|
Post by sara on May 14, 2006 20:57:17 GMT -5
Good question, Sara, that's what I'd probably be asking you too, Apolosgal. And Warhorse, ? Which one are you talkin' 'bout? I have an HSA so I don't have those kinds of problems anymore, Thank God! I'm talking about the one for the senior citizens. They have to be part of a prescription drug plan or be penalized. I dont think it's right to force people in to joining a plan or insurance or what ever. Especially my dad, who hates taking pills and refuses it. It's requested in his will and in his doctor charts. I just dont like this thing that you have to have this coverage. I can understand to force insurance on homes and vehicles, because you can always opt on not owning either, but your own life and livelyhood? Warhorse, They are not forcing the prescription drug coverage on the people eligible for social security. The penalty you have read about is, if the ones who were eligible during this initial enrollment decide that they don't want it for now, and then later change their minds after the enrollment period is over, then they are penalized 1% for not signing up when they first could. This is probably because the ones that suddenly decide later that they want to sign up are doing it because they suddenly discover they are old and sick and need some help with their prescriptions. The idea of insurance is to get it before you need it just in case you need it later. And if you dad is ever going to get sick in his old age and need prescriptions, you better hope he has coverage or guess who will be paying through the nose to keep him alive. You guessed it...you and your siblings.
|
|
|
Post by californiagrown on May 14, 2006 21:26:43 GMT -5
I will say this once and only once because i am commie/socialist/ viewed by America as the enemy but here it goes I HATE INSURANCE its unnessary it should be FREE not child should ever have to die becuase their parents cant afford a 100,000 dolar heart transplant. i mean i duno if its just me or if im going crazy like 6 million people dont have insurance! and HMO does nothign to help people is RIDIC! some grad students at harvard did a study and found out that wiht all the money people paid went to the gov't for free health insurance for all we would have more than enough to help out people. BUT NO! because of tupid FRICKEN capilatalism and lobiests we cant! sometimes i feel like im the only one who feels like this and that im taking crazy pills or something
ok im done with that
and GAS! my god no one has it worse than the Bay Area right now i thinks its $3.93! its ridic man
thanx warhorse for this thread i need it so bad!
|
|
|
Post by sara on May 14, 2006 21:45:46 GMT -5
I will say this once and only once because i am commie/socialist/ viewed by America as the enemy but here it goes I HATE INSURANCE its unnessary it should be FREE not child should ever have to die becuase their parents cant afford a 100,000 dolar heart transplant. i mean i duno if its just me or if im going crazy like 6 million people dont have insurance! and HMO does nothign to help people is RIDIC! some grad students at harvard did a study and found out that wiht all the money people paid went to the gov't for free health insurance for all we would have more than enough to help out people. BUT NO! because of tupid FRICKEN capilatalism and lobiests we cant! sometimes i feel like im the only one who feels like this and that im taking crazy pills or something ok im done with that and GAS! my god no one has it worse than the Bay Area right now i thinks its $3.93! its ridic man thanx warhorse for this thread i need it so bad! I absolutely love the passion with which the young approach life. I am not being sarcastic and putting you down. I am being absolutely serious. You see, the young are liberal and idealistic, full of passion...that's where you are. Then we go through a period of conservatism and selfishness. But then we come out the other end as we age and realize that the system stinks and we "are our brothers keepers" and if we need to pay a little more taxes, so be it, and we become liberals again. That is where I am. So I am not being sarcastic when I say that. I am simply smiling at your passion. But it isn't insurance your are venting about, it is private insurance. What you are wanting is government system where by the insurance is paid for by taxes instead of by individuals and employers and everyone get it instead of just those who can afford it or work for an employer who pays it, like in Canada and all over Europe. And Capitalism or Communism has nothing to do with it.
|
|