|
|
Post by Elle on Oct 3, 2006 17:16:11 GMT -5
Im I reading correctly or did I read something about a critism on Apolo appearing on his birthday suit. Difficult to please, I see. I think he looks great. We're in the times were that is considered being well covered. It was done tasteful and he looks hot. God. I don't see anything wrong with it.
Last time I checked, we have a "Apolo's Package" thread on this forum. and it has nothing to do with the post. If I ever wanted to complain, I'd write him.
Sorry about my venting. Love you all the same still. Muah gals.
Apolo looks amazingly cute.
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic on Oct 3, 2006 18:38:58 GMT -5
Well, I know some feel differently and some are uncomfortable with it, but I personally see nothing wrong with the picture. You can't see anything and I'd not be surprised if he wasn't even naked to begin with. Hollywood has lots of way around that, such as flesh colored bikini's and/or bikini briefs. He could very well be wearing one and any sign of it has been airbrushed away.
Or, he could be completely naked! Who knows!
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest II on Oct 3, 2006 19:51:51 GMT -5
I don't think he's nude. I think he's wearing little panties. Little red white and blue panties.
|
|
|
|
Post by BBP on Oct 3, 2006 20:29:43 GMT -5
LMAO @ Apolo's patriotic panties.
(GOD I HATE THAT WORD...but God how I love alliteration).
|
|
|
|
Post by laura6 on Oct 3, 2006 21:20:55 GMT -5
I just got the actual magazine....he not wearing panties....only his birthday suit....
|
|
|
|
Post by Elle on Oct 3, 2006 21:55:46 GMT -5
I just got the actual magazine....he not wearing panties....only his birthday suit.... Wicked!!!!!!! I cant wait 2 see it meself. Seriously, for how more is the negative criticism going. ITS JUST A BLOODY PHOTO. nothing more. this feels the same as with the whole Allison thing. Could we just let the man be? or are we from a diff. century in which people dont come out naked on the telly? Who cares? (I see some do) Why could we not just enjoy it. I dont see any difference from when we're looking at his photos of his @ss or his package. I don't hear anyone complaining there. Bloody Hell, could we just let him be? No wonder he's so bloody private with everything. Nobody likes to hear negative criticism, especially if they dont even know the person. Its for a good cause anyways. I dont see him selling his body (although, I believe there are some who'd pay good money) We already see him naked, in a sorta of way, in his skinsuit. The only difference is that its colored blue and not flesh. |
|
|
|
Post by sara on Oct 3, 2006 22:17:01 GMT -5
I just got the actual magazine....he not wearing panties....only his birthday suit.... Wicked!!!!!!! I cant wait 2 see it meself. Seriously, for how more is the negative criticism going. ITS JUST A BLOODY PHOTO. nothing more. this feels the same as with the whole Allison thing. Could we just let the man be? or are we from a diff. century in which people dont come out naked on the telly? Who cares? (I see some do) Why could we not just enjoy it. I dont see any difference from when we're looking at his photos of his @ss or his package. I don't hear anyone complaining there. Bloody Hell, could we just let him be? No wonder he's so bloody private with everything. Nobody likes to hear negative criticism, especially if they dont even know the person. Its for a good cause anyways. I dont see him selling his body (although, I believe there are some who'd pay good money) We already see him naked, in a sorta of way, in his skinsuit. The only difference is that its colored blue and not flesh. Actually, it isn't the picture of Apolo that I don't like. It is the ad itself. Actually, I think he looks quite nice.  Really nice indeed. What I don't like, is that the ad has everyone clothed but him. Maybe they should all be nude.  Or all clothed. But why is only Apolo nude? It looks like his picture belongs in a different ad. Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by majestic on Oct 4, 2006 3:42:08 GMT -5
Woohoo...here's another ad! From OZ...    And another shot of the first ad, without the print... ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by tabatha on Oct 4, 2006 3:47:19 GMT -5
ohgod,ohgod,ohgod,ohgod....aaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggg! |
|
|
|
Post by majestic on Oct 4, 2006 3:49:57 GMT -5
Gee Tabs...do you like it? It's so hard to tell sometimes!  |
|
|
|
Post by tabatha on Oct 4, 2006 3:55:36 GMT -5
haha, very funny ;D
laura's missing the good stuff!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay on Oct 4, 2006 4:18:45 GMT -5
okay the 1st and 2nd pic are okay....in fact i love them....very natural and simple...and the 3rd, eerr okay.....
|
|
|
|
Post by tabatha on Oct 4, 2006 4:21:55 GMT -5
i like the jeans he's wearing, he looks good in jeans.
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic on Oct 4, 2006 4:46:06 GMT -5
I lightened these...they were rather dark.   |
|
|
|
Post by billiey36 guest on Oct 4, 2006 9:29:19 GMT -5
That thigh! Mygawd! I see why they covered it up with print. That thing's a lethal weapon.
Apparently he got nakeder as the shoot went on.
Thank you, Annie.
|
|
